why compulsion is wrong!
Dear brother or sister in truth,
May the grace of our Lord grant you peace and comfort in these trialing times.
I feel compelled to speak out and let my voice be heard. It is true that we are called to be self-sufficient and not seek to control others, to be happy and accept the blessings we receive (1 Thess.) However, I am not writing to tell others what they must do, but seeking to prevent significant injustice from occurring in the world.
These comments are based on my own reading, interpretation and opinions coming from my personal research and understanding. Please do your own investigations and make up your own mind on what to think and do.
Many will not be ready to hear what I have to say and are too trusting of the authorities. (Yes, there is a place for that too, but this is not limitless.) Sometimes we must call out the wrongs and mistakes being made and speak up for truth.
My fight is exactly that, for truth and freedom. These two are equal essentials in our salvation, life and happiness. Evil cannot prosper in an environment where truth and freedom are present, because the are from the Lord and are the Lord!
First, let me begin by expressing that I am fighting against compulsion and deception, not against science. I am for full transparency and accountability, personal responsibility and freedom.
I am one of the 10-20% of people that are extremely sceptical (of power, vaccines and so forth), not just because of the huge potential for corruption and deceit (just follow the evidence and money), or because we see a manufactured state of extreme fear and hyper-emotion, but because there are proven to be risks of serious side effects!
Yes, for decades we have heard the mantra “safe and effective”, yet pharmaceutical companies have been sheltered from any legal liability and billions of dollars have been paid out in damages.
There are so many angles I could come from to highlight the plethora of ways in which we are being manipulated it would fill several books. There is plenty out there and I will simply ask you to remember the “wise as serpents” bit and not just to focus on the “mild as doves”, with respect to the Christian calling.
We know we operate in the natural world and in a sense it is truly the “devil’s playground” it is where evil and selfishness is able to control many, so it should come as no surprise to find that this selfishness infects all parts of society, not in the least those areas of power, such as the political class and government bureaucrats – let alone the elite kabal of globalist billionaires who own the media companies, banks and pharmaceutical industries. Don’t be naïve!
However despite the messaging being regurgitated per synchronised scripts by the fearful fools and useful idiots, besides the willing power-hungry, the truth surfaces regularly and is available to anyone willing to look. Many though will hear, but not listen.
Right now, the godless are destroying all the fundamentals of western societies – the basis of our prosperity, which is rooted in Judeo-Christian (ie biblical) principles and values: Truth and Freedom!
- Ongoing wearing of face-nappies just helps signal everone to be fearfull, but does little to protect us. Anyone who has worked with dust-masks will tell you dust still gets through, yet a piece of cloth will stop a much smaller sized virus? The only help to limit the transmission of droplets when coughing or sneezing – no different from doing so into your handkerchief, hands, t-shirt or elbow.
- The compulsory and increasing draconian levels of house-arrest do not affect any of those who impose these severe limits on our freedoms. They destroy lives and livelihoods, but do little to prevent the inevitable exposure. It is just kicking the can down the road at an incredibly high cost…
We are told, vaccines are the only way out of this situation. All the eggs are in that basket. Please ignore valid and proven treatment options (ie triple-therapy based on Ivervectin and Zinc or hydroxychloroquine and Zinc with another anti-biotic, because accepting those would undermine the legal basis of our state of emergency and use of ‘un-proven’ vaccines.
We are told we all MUST vaccinate! My response: no thanks!
Furthermore, to those Christians who vote for compulsion and who seek, through the instrument of government state powers, to control others around them – you are wrong! Moreover, if you yourself are not willing to be controlled or willing to submit under the existing laws, then you should not seek to have others controlled or to have new laws for others to submit to. Pretty simple stuff.
Christians are called to truth and to leave others in peace and freedom!
UPDATE: Please watch this not to be missed presentation at the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons by Dr. Peter McCullough, MD – https://rumble.com/vnbv86-winning-the-war-against-therapeutic-nihilism-and-trusted-treatments-vs-unte.html
Are vaccines effective?
Looking at the vaccine trial data from the manufacturer, they do offer a high level of inoculation against catching Covid19 after 2nd dose (95% with 95% certainty) and from serious Covid19 (75%, with 99.5% certainty) for the two months.
Source: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
UPDATE: Must Watch this documentary about what has been happening. The truth uncovered! https://rumble.com/vnr7ei-covidland-the-lockdown-full-movie.html
Breakdown of table 2 above is found in table 3 below.
The commentary states:
“This report includes 2 months of follow-up after the second dose of vaccine for half the trial participants and up to 14 weeks’ maximum follow-up for a smaller subset. Therefore, both the occurrence of adverse events more than 2 to 3.5 months after the second dose and more comprehensive information on the duration of protection remain to be determined.”
Source: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
In other words, longitudinal studies are not yet performed, but some data coming out now indicates further need for ‘booster shots’ (already) and a concerning level of impact for those who have been fully vaccinated if they do catch Covid19 (breakthrough cases). In other words, the inoculative effect of these ‘vaccines’ are rapidly waning.
(I put ‘vaccine’ in inverted commas, because these do not contain viral material, as a vaccine would, but rather provide genetic programming to our cells (mRNA) to stimulate the body to attack the proteins it has created as a result.)
Source: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
Based on this data (Table 2), 7 days after the second dose, the vaccine group had a total of 9 cases of Covid19, of which 8 (or 89%) showed no evidence of infection (a-symptomatic) and the placebo group had a total of 169, of which 162 (or 95%) had no evidence of infection. This then also means that Covid 19 is extremely mild for the vast majority (eg, 95% of unvaccinated) of those who get infected. And technically, these are not ‘cases’ but positive test results.
So the true risk reduction for symptomatic Covid is 7 (169-162) – 1 (9 -8) = 6 / 18,198 = 0.033% (needing to inject >18,000 people to prevent 6 symptomatic cases of Covid (with 18,192 getting little or no benefit) – or if we are generous and include all positive test results: 169 – 9 = 160 / 18,198 = 0.88% absolute risk reduction of getting a positive result. This means you need to jab 113 people (18,198/160) to prevent 1 positive test result and jab 3,033 (18,198/6) to prevent 1 person getting covid symptoms. Ridiculous!
Source: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
However, based on Table s5 in this report, using their 75% relative risk reduction efficacy from severe Covid19, one would expect therefore still a 25% ‘break-through’ rate. Meaning those who are vaccinated still get Covid.
So, it needs to be highlighted and repeated that the ‘vaccine’ effectiveness of 95% is incredibly misleading, because it only deals with ‘relative risk reduction’ within a specified cohort (who are NOT actually exposed to the virus either). This leads people to think that they have a 95% rate of protection, which is wrong and depends significantly on personal risk factors! What is more appropriate and accurate according to research is an absolute risk reduction, as this takes into consideration a ‘whole of population’ risk. For Pfizer (for example) this is closer to 0.84% (and again dependent on personal risk factors). This means that it takes effectively 119 fully jabbed people to prevent a single case of Covid! – Yes, really!
Source: Olliaro P, Torreele E, Vaillant M. COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness-the elephant (not) in the room. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(7):e279-e280. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00069-0 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8057721/
In fact, if you look at the actual numbers it is likely to be closer to 0.4%, meaning you need to jab 256 people to avoid a single case (1/0.004), with the other 255 getting no benefit.
Reference: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-4
Still think it is that great? Now if you wish to compare the risk of having negative effects from these jabs? NHS VAERS and other systems around the world record extremely serious side effects occur and perhaps more frequent than you think at 0.026%!.
Source: United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Centers for Disease Control (CDC) / Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 1990 – 08/06/2021, CDC WONDER On-line Database. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html on Aug 18, 2021 7:12:09 AM (Death; Life Threatening; Permanent Disability; Congenital Anomaly / Birth Defect *; Hospitalized)
As we will show, those who get Covid19 following vaccination also have a higher chance of serious outcomes.
Source: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 and supplementary Data file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745181/bin/NEJMoa2034577_appendix.pdf
a closer look at breakthrough infections
Comparing a characteristically matched cohort of Moderna, Pfizer and unvaccinated individuals, this study concludes:
“The occurrence of breakthrough infections and reports of diminished neutralization of emergent variants by vaccine-elicited sera mandate the continual monitoring of the comparative effectiveness and durability of COVID-19 vaccines. Overall, we find that in our study population from Minnesota, both vaccines strongly reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19, but individuals vaccinated with mRNA-1273 were about half as likely to experience breakthrough infections as individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2.”
For me though, this study is most significant in that it shows such a small negative outcome for the unvaccinated cohort, with only 0.328% requiring in hospital care, 0.068% admission to intensive care units and 0.016% resulting in death. Or 4 deaths out of 321 confirmed cases in unvaccinated, which is 1.25%.
Comparing the Public Health England (PHE) Technical Briefing 20, between 1 February and 2 August 2021 a total of 48 out of 147612 (only 0.03%) of unvaccinated inviduals younger than 50 died as a result of Covid-19, with an average death rate of 0.17% and hospitalisation rate of 1.96% out of 151054 unvaccinated people with confirmed Delta variant of Covid-19
We know that severe negative outcomes predominantly impact older individuals and those with compromised health (such as diabetes, obesity, or other comorbidities) and may account for the much higher numbers in real life compared to trial studies.
For example, according to PHE almost 6% of those over 50 years of age who were unvaccinated and contracted Covid-19 died (205 out of 3440), while those in the same age category who were fully vaccinated had a 1.81% chance of dying when contracting Covid-19. While not 95% or even 75% effective, still a massive reduction in the vaccinated group.
Source: Puranik et al.,Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence, https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707 (MedRxiv pre-print. not yet peer reviewed)
So what is wrong with vaccine compulsion?
Let me now highlight a few factors – there are significant other concerns with the Covid19 vaccines specifically, but I will just focus on a few – official government published statistics that should make you think.
Let us start with this report:
Public Health England, in their latest Technical Briefing, has released some interesting statistics with respect to vaccination for Covid19. These are not small numbers and so the findings are of significant concern. These are also underpinned by reports elsewhere of similar experiences (Israel, US).
The below table has been created using the report’s exact data in Table 5. It shows that:
- Overall, while the vaccine offers a period of significant protection, once they catch the virus have higher chance of being admitted into hospital and dying!
The Delta strain has been said to be far more transmissible and this is said by our governments to be the reason for their additional and extreme measures, such as curfews, house arrest and so forth.
However, while it is the dominant strain and slightly more transmissible (still only about 1.2 Rn) this report shows there is far less concern and reason to panic. This table is produced from the data found in Table 4. It shows:
- Delta variant cases result in significant fewer hospital admissions and deaths, when compared with Alpha (and other dominant strains).
Furthermore, the report itself clearly articulates the following observation, which makes a solid case AGAINST treating unvaccinated different to vaccinated! So much for the unvaccinated being the risk to society – there isn’t and never was a risk to vaccinated by the unvaccinated! There is no scientific evidence for a magical 80% ‘herd immunity’ from vaccines. This is mere speculation and posturing.
The vaccinated catch and spread disease, making vaccine mandates and the ‘fear of unvaccinated’ absolutely non-sensical!
Consider the following recent findings:
“asymptomatic COVID-19-positive individuals are less contagious than individuals with severe infection, precisely because in asymptomatic individuals the immune system has an excellent response, immediately attacking the virus, slowing its replication and decreasing its potency and the likelihood of infecting other people”. Meaning vaccinated or not, it is your symptoms that matter most and unvaccinated who are not symptomatic pose little risk!
- Vitiello A, Ferrara F, Troiano V, La Porta R. COVID-19 vaccines and decreased transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Inflammopharmacology. July 2021. doi:10.1007/s10787-021-00847-2
More importantly, vaccination doesn’t stop you from being a transmission risk: “the vaccine might not prevent the transmission of the virus, “however, it could significantly reduce illness”.
- van Doremalen N, Lambe T, Spencer A, et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Nature. 2020;586(7830):578-582. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2608-y
And the PHE technical briefing states: “whilst vaccination may reduce an individual’s overall risk of becoming infected, once they are infected there is limited difference in viral load (and Ct values) between those who are vaccinated and unvaccinated. Given they have similar Ct values, this suggests limited difference in infectiousness”.
With the document showing that viral loads in people who catch the Alpha variant or Delta variant are broadly similar.
- Public Health England. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England. Sage. 2021;(April):1-50. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1009243/Technical_Briefing_20.pdf.
This is also said by John Hopkins: “fully vaccinated person who experiences a breakthrough infection can spread the virus just as much as an unvaccinated person”.
- new-data-on-covid-19-transmission-by-vaccinated-individuals @ publichealth.jhu.edu. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/new-data-on-covid-19-transmission-by-vaccinated-individuals.
And the US government Centre for Disease Control: “evidence suggests that fully vaccinated people who do become infected with the Delta variant can spread the virus to others”.
- fully-vaccinated-guidance @ www.cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated-guidance.html#:~:text=Fully vaccinated people should be,isolate if they test positive.
Or more to the point: “In fact, most vaccines don’t fully protect against infection, even if they can block symptoms from appearing. As a result, vaccinated people can unknowingly carry and spread pathogens. Occasionally, they can even start epidemics.”
- 20210203-why-vaccinated-people-may-still-be-able-to-spread-covid-19 @ www.bbc.com. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210203-why-vaccinated-people-may-still-be-able-to-spread-covid-19.
AGAIN verified by the research!
“Fully vaccinated people can carry as much delta virus as unvaccinated people, data indicate.”
BMJ 2021; 374 doi: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2074 (Published 19 August 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;374:n2074 and Pouwels KB, Pritchard E, Matthews PC, et al, for the COVID-19 Infection Survey Team. Impact of delta on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK. https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/covid-19/covid-19-infection-survey/results/new-studies.
This makes vaccine mandates nonsensical and the whole “unvaccinated causing the pandemic” or “unvaccinated are a risk” absolutely infuriating!
We so often here about modelling – “the models predict”…. You know that is ludicrous in any field. It is just another way of saying “computer says, so shut up.” You can make the models say whatever you want them to say and any sane mathematician will tell you that it is impossible to be accurate with multiple unknown variables. It all becomes speculation and hyperbole to suite the political narrative.
What are the numbers actually?
So overall reports of deaths from Covid (or more accurately ‘with Covid’) (all cases and variants) is about 2% – looking at the WHO and official data. We can see from the PHE report 2% is the number of deaths from the Delta variant for those 50 years and over (the vast majority of people who have died are older, so it is not so much the age, but the higher level of health vulnerabilities and comorbidities).
In the US, the CDC reports 1.69% of all reported cases result in death.
They also report 0.026% (26 in 100,000) severe vaccine adverse reactions, including deaths (0.003%) – for the moment ignoring the suggestion that the vast majority of these are never reported.
The risk of dying from Covid Delta is about the same or less (71 in 265,749) for those below 50 years of age (and reason for this age bracket is fundamentally the additional negative health factors or comorbidities in the older group) as having severe side-effects from the vaccine. When adding the added higher risk of death for fully vaccinated when they contract the disease, this makes a person like me think twice before becoming a guinea-pig with some experimental vaccine!
If you check the US VAERS system or the UK equivalent, the total reported deaths and those of serious damage resulting post vaccination is more than ALL other vaccines combined! (the total reporting numbers doubled in the past 6 months)
So, yes serious problems can occur from the vaccine! So it should always be a personal choice!
In Australia, the TGA decides which numbers to report. Besides 6 reported deaths from the AstraZenica vaccine:
Now – let us have a closer look at the Pfizer Covid19 vaccine:
Source: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
Source: Supplementary Data file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745181/bin/NEJMoa2034577_appendix.pdf
Moderna
Source: Baden, Lindsey R et al. “Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 384,5 (2021): 403-416. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
Source: supplementary data file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787219/bin/NEJMoa2035389_appendix.pdf
“No evidence of vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease was noted, and fewer cases of severe Covid-19 or any Covid-19 were observed among participants who received mRNA-1273 than among those who received placebo (Tables S13 and S14). Adverse events that were deemed by the trial team to be related to the vaccine or placebo were reported among 4.5% of participants in the placebo group and 8.2% in the mRNA-1273 group. The most common treatment-related adverse events (those reported in at least 1% of participants) in the placebo group and the mRNA-1273 group were fatigue (1.2% and 1.5%) and headache (0.9% and 1.4%).
In the overall population, the incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was higher in the mRNA-1273 group (71 participants [0.5%]) than in the placebo group (28 participants [0.2%]) (Tables S8 and S15). The relative incidence of these adverse events according to vaccine group was not affected by age.”
In the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine information published by the manufacturer:
http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471 (health care professional information, taken from https://www.pfizer.com/products/product-detail/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine)
They report in a section on Serious Adverse Events:
“In Study 2, among participants 16 through 55 years of age who had received at least 1 dose of vaccine or placebo (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine = 10,841; placebo = 10,851), serious adverse events from Dose 1 through up to 30 days after Dose 2 in ongoing follow-up were reported by 0.4% of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine recipients and by 0.3% of placebo recipients.
In a similar analysis, in participants 56 years of age and older (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine = 7,960, placebo = 7,934), serious adverse events were reported by 0.8% of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine recipients and by 0.6% of placebo recipients who received at least 1 dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine or placebo, respectively.
In these analyses, 91.6% of study participants had at least 30 days of follow-up after Dose 2.”
Meaning:
- You will see a 25% higher number of serious side effects in vaccinated within 30 day of the second dose, over the placebo group, or 0.4% (vs 0.3% in placebo) and 0.8% (vs 0.6% in placebo)
- There is no data on effect of pregnant or lactating women
- Serious and unexpected side effects may occur.
- Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.
While Pfizer Covid19 and Moderna Covid19 vaccine trials do, many vaccine trials do NOT use actual placebo (0.9% saline solution).
Frequently a different vaccine (such as flu or meningococcal vaccine) is used as ‘placebo’. This of course skews the safety data significantly!
There is also some shocking information about potential Graphene Oxide content (poison) in these vaccines, but I have not sufficient technical understanding to unpack and verify these claims. The investigation discussed on the Stew Peters show did go through a lot of detail and seemed highly credible.
You may also wish to read this article before reading further: https://www.freedomphilosophy.life/down-with-compulsion/
What about others, like flu vaccines?
Each vaccine is different and mRNA vaccines certainly are, but here also is a previous look Flu vaccines:
FACT: Vaccines are inherently unsafe and carry a degree of unknown risk.
This is the reason many countries, including the US, Canada, UK and New Zealand have introduced a no-fault vaccine injury compensation scheme. It removes the threat of litigation from vaccine manufacturers as a result of faulty products and removes any attribution should there be negligence.
- https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/5/10-081901/en/
FACT: serious vaccine damage does occur and new products can have untested consequences
While no longer available in Australia, in 2010 the Seqirus (formerly bioCSL) FluVax and FluVax Junior caused significant damage with dangerous fevers and febrile convulsions rate of 4.4 per 1,000 in children under 5.
- https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/vaccine-preventable-diseases/influenza-flu
One also only needs to look at the manufacturer product inserts (not the basic information page) of any vaccine to realise there are dangerous ingredients and serious possible side-effects. These include anaphylaxis, seizures, Guillain–Barré syndrome and others.
There are patients that may be at higher risk of side effects, such as those with allergies (egg, latex etc), those with asthma, neurological disorders, thrombocytopenia or receiving immune-oncology therapy.
FACT: vaccines contain extremely toxic chemicals
While vaccines differ from country to country, Australian vaccines, like any other, contain dangerous toxins according to the manufacturer information sheet for medical professionals (you won’t see this in consumer information sheets):
Formaldehyde: a highly toxic systemic poison and causes neurological damage and cancer.
Octoxinol-9: is a spermatocide and a dangerous poison
AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION
SANOFI FLUZONE HIGH-DOSE: http://www.guildlink.com.au/gc/ws/sw/pi.cfm?product=swpfluhd11012
SANOFI FLUQUADRI: http://www.guildlink.com.au/gc/ws/sw/pi.cfm?product=swpfluqu21219
GSK FLUARIX TETRA: https://au.gsk.com/media/484448/fluarix_tetra_pi_au.pdf
MYLAN HEALTH INFLUVAC TETRA: https://www.mylan.ca/-/media/mylanca/documents/english/product-pdf/influvactetrapm.pdf?la=en-ca
SEQURIS AFLURIA QUAD: https://labeling.seqirus.com/PI/AU/Afluria-Quad/EN/Afluria-Quad-Product-Information.pdf
SEQURIS FLUAD QUAD: https://labeling.seqirus.com/PI/AU/Fluad/EN/Fluad-Product-Information.pdf
FACT: Vaccines induce an indiscriminate immune reaction!
Some vaccines also result in false positive tests for HIV, Hepatitis and HTLV-1 due to the “non-specific IgM response” they induce. In other words, vaccines create a hyper-alert T-cell response, which may result in or contribute to auto-immune disorders.
FACT: side effects are way more common than “1 in a million”
Frequency of side-effects are indicated using language like common, uncommon, rare or very rare. Very rare means less than 1 in 10,000 and rare means between 1 per 1,000 and 1 per 10,000. In other words, if all Australians were to be vaccinated (24 million), a ‘rare’ side effect would affect up to 24,000 people.
- http://www.guildlink.com.au/gc/ws/sw/pi.cfm?product=swpvaxit11219
For contrast, according to the CDC each year between 3 and 11 percent of US falls ill with influenza. With an estimated hospitalisation of 0.01% and average mortality rate for flu of 0.1%.
This makes a flu vaccine simply non-sensical and potentially the number of people suffer seriously from the side effect higher than the potential flu effects.
In other words, if flu would affect only 10% of population, why would you vaccinate 100%?
If hospitalisation of flu is 0.01% then why accept a 0.1% risk of some ‘rare’ serious side effect of a vaccine?
Some ‘rare’ (1:1,000 – 1:10,000) observations:
Transient lymphadenopathy, Allergic reactions (including anaphylactic reactions), Neuritis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Urticaria, pruritus, erythema, angioedema Influenza-like illness and malaise
Some of ‘common’ (1:10 – 1:100) and ‘very common’ (more than 1:10) observations:
Gastrointestinal symptoms (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain), Myalgia and Arthralgia
All 2020 southern hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccines available for use in Australia are quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs). In 2020, there are two newly registered products (Vaxigrip Tetra and Fluad Quad).
| Sponsor | Tradename | Age group |
| Sanofi-Aventis | FluQuadri | 6 months and over* |
| Vaxigrip Tetra | 6 months and over* | |
| GlaxoSmithKline | Fluarix Tetra | 6 months and over* |
| Mylan Health | Influvac Tetra | 3 years and over |
| Seqirus | Afluria Quad | 5 years and over |
| Seqirus | Fluad Quad | 65 years and over |
- https://www.tga.gov.au/alert/2020-seasonal-influenza-vaccines
- https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/03/atagi-advice-on-seasonal-influenza-vaccines-in-2020.pdf
FACT: despite the use of spermatocide, vaccines have not been evaluated for possible effects on human fertility!
FACT: safety of use in lactacting (nursing) women and possible excretion of the vaccine in human breast milk is not evaluated!
FACT: vaccine clinical trials are not properly conducted with an inert saline placebo!
FACT: interaction studies are not performed to test effects of concurrent medicine use!
FACT: vaccines have not been evaluated for their genotoxic potential!
FACT: vaccines have not been evaluated for their carcinogenic potential!
FACT: the flu virus is highly unpredictable, limiting the effectiveness of vaccines!
Influenza is known to have significant antigenic changes from time to time (ie its behaviour changes dramatically) and so vaccines have limited protection only for those specific strains it contains. Quadri-flu contains four strains: two type A and two type B. Vaccine does not protect against type C or D. Influenza A is the primary cause of flu epidemics, and they constantly change and are difficult to predict.
- https://www.uabmedicine.org/-/flu-strains-explained-and-how-the-vaccine-works
FACT: effectiveness of vaccines is very similar to the placebo effect!
According to the American CDC, flu vaccines reduce risk on average between 40-60%. This is no better than the placebo effect. According to a Harvard article placebo is 50% effective, while psychology today reports that it can be as high as 72%.
This makes it all the more remarkable that vaccine clinical trials are not measured against a true placebo (saline solution).
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm#howeffective
https://www.health.harvard.edu/mental-health/the-power-of-the-placebo-effect
https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/brain-sense/201201/the-placebo-effect-how-it-works
